You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic
June 2 2024 7.09am

Does Olise have a buy out Clause- Yes or No? (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 40 of 55 < 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 >

Topic Locked

View MrRobbo's Profile MrRobbo Flag Purley 16 Aug 23 8.26am Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace

300% profit is meaningless unless it reaches the market value.

Ultimately we can all try and be philosophical about the profit we've made on him but the reality is that similar quality players are going for 2/3 times as much.

Chelsea know that they're getting an absolute bargain, that's why they're doing it. They don't need him.

I suspect you are right on the value and their need for him.

But we bought him for under market value too. And he probably wouldn't have signed for us if we'd insisted on no release clause or one at 100m

I think everyone is so unhappy because we historically have been so bad at replacing players.

But give Doug and Parish some credit, we've go the most 'sellable' team I can ever remember. Lets back them to find the next one.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 16 Aug 23 8.28am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by MrRobbo

Of course there is, this interest in our squad is hard for many to accept at the moment. In main I suspect because we are not used to it, we never really have anyone that is worth buying.


Maybe not but a future as a feeder club isn't appealing. The Premier League is all about money and after a decade we're no better off.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 16 Aug 23 8.29am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

I think the rumour that we are going to report Chelsea for tapping up is PR by Parish for us fans.

Apparently we are "considering doing that" unfortunately we need Chelsea more than they need us besides all clubs do it so I will be surprised if anything more happens.


 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 16 Aug 23 8.31am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Would you have the same opinion if it was Eze heading out the door for 300% profit?

I wouldnt be happy and i dont think Eze has the disiplin to play for a top,top side, if he goes i think it is a mistake for him, he is Le Tissier.

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View rikz's Profile rikz Flag Croydon 16 Aug 23 8.34am Send a Private Message to rikz Add rikz as a friend

Originally posted by Adamoc123

Anyone know if it is likely there's a sell-on clause for Olise. I don't know much when it comes to contracts and with this 35m release clause does that mean any sell on clause if there is any is void. I'm really just reaching for any possibility of getting more for Olise, the fact he is going for only 35 given the inflated market and his talent just makes my stomach churn.

A report I read said reading have a 10% sell on clause.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Lanzo-Ad's Profile Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 16 Aug 23 8.35am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace


300% profit is meaningless unless it reaches the market value.

Ultimately we can all try and be philosophical about the profit we've made on him but the reality is that similar quality players are going for 2/3 times as much.

Chelsea know that they're getting an absolute bargain, that's why they're doing it. They don't need him.

Ridiculous statement, 300% profit is tremendous, even though it is under his value, remember, Benteke, Sakho, PVA etc

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View taylors lovechild's Profile taylors lovechild Flag 16 Aug 23 8.39am Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Originally posted by Canterbury Palace


300% profit is meaningless unless it reaches the market value.

Ultimately we can all try and be philosophical about the profit we've made on him but the reality is that similar quality players are going for 2/3 times as much.

Chelsea know that they're getting an absolute bargain, that's why they're doing it. They don't need him.

For me that's the biggest disappointment. Chelsea have Sterling, Madueke and the new Brazilian lad who play on the right wing and still have Ziyech on the books too. This does feel like a case of stopping their rivals from signing a bargain.

If the clause is there and Olise wanted to leave there's not much we can do, but as I and others have already said, doing it this late in the window is a sh!tty thing to do as Palace were never going to accept less than the release clause. Every club Palace buy from seem to say how well the club conducts itself in dealings, even Reading said so when we met Olise's release clause with them. Chelsea are becoming quite an ugly little club. I would put money on the Hall deal stalling because of Chelsea's behaviour.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View rollercoaster's Profile rollercoaster Flag Cornwall 16 Aug 23 8.41am Send a Private Message to rollercoaster Add rollercoaster as a friend

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Ridiculous statement, 300% profit is tremendous, even though it is under his value, remember, Benteke, Sakho, PVA etc

Think you are missing the point Lanzo, in todays market we cannot replace Olise for 35M and we do not have a ready substitute in reserve. Therefore, even if we get a replacement with potential, for this season our team will be weaker.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View steveeagle67's Profile steveeagle67 Flag london 16 Aug 23 8.51am Send a Private Message to steveeagle67 Add steveeagle67 as a friend

I’m assuming that if we’re reporting chelsea over Olise, that the Hall deal is over now!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 16 Aug 23 8.53am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I suspect I might be on my own here but I was never 100% convinced that Olise really wanted to be at Palace. He seemed not to ever be part of the “family” and not that bothered. He had some fun with Eze and their partnership could have blossomed this season but I wonder without regular game time whether anything similar will be possible at Chelsea. I suspect he might soon feel on the sidelines and having to fight to get noticed doesn’t seem a natural instinct of his.

So I worry more for him than I do for us. He will undoubtedly make a lot of money but his career could easily stall. The players going to Saudi are mostly in the last phases of their careers. Olise is in the first of his. Maybe he will be back with his tail between his legs? It happened before!

I am also of this opinion.

I was never going to say anything against Olise whilst he was very much here but what I think was optimistically viewed as a brooding mystique about him was just an arrogance and discontent. Serious Anelka, 'Le Sulk' vibes. And don't get me wrong, I bought into the 'he's a character' narrative too.

I have this thought of a young man who has been told he's the most talented and beautiful in the world too often, and too many times, by his own mother. That's fine so long as he's performing for our team but at a club like ours such a player is only ever going to feel that they're doing us a favour just by being here. I imagine there's feeling in his camp that a move to Chelsea was an inevitability hence we were only ever a somewhat laborious stepping stone.

I am petty enough now to hope he plays 6 games for Chelsea, all off the bench, falls into obscurity and ends up in a no-mans land of a career. I'd suggest that's the smart money too. Could very easily be a crash back down to earth for him and his 'camp'. Chelsea have done this before, just taken players out of the game, so to speak, even if the benefit is to weaken other teams despite not improving their own. Perhaps a loan to a newly promoted side in Ligue 1 next season is on the cards? I'd laugh in that instance.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View grumpymort's Profile grumpymort Flag US/Thailand/UK 16 Aug 23 8.58am Send a Private Message to grumpymort Add grumpymort as a friend

Lets say this is true in his contract a 35m release clause this again shows how poorly we are run.

This is a pattern with the club poor contracts.

In the current market he is worth close to 50-60m to lose him at 35m is terrible business.

I really hope this is all untrue.

 


(VPN) - [Link]
(Alt VPN) - [Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Palace Old Geezer's Profile Palace Old Geezer Flag Midhurst 16 Aug 23 9.00am Send a Private Message to Palace Old Geezer Add Palace Old Geezer as a friend

There's much excitement on the Shed End forum about him returning home. They clearly see him as a Chelsea academy star who's done his apprenticeship and is now ready to rejoin his family.

 


Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 40 of 55 < 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic