BBC (again)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 30 Sep 23 9.42pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Go on then, put the headline link up to show us you have seen it on the bastion of fairness. If it was last week it would be in one of the 50 news pages you can access. I didn’t read it on their website. I heard it on Radio 4. Nevertheless it took about 20 seconds of searching on their site to find this. Surely you can spare 20 seconds if you are that bothered:-
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 30 Sep 23 9.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
How predictable And true!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The Dolphin 01 Oct 23 7.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
And of course this a major world headline that needs to be right smack bang up there on their main homepage - biased numpties!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 01 Oct 23 10.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
And of course this a major world headline that needs to be right smack bang up there on their main homepage - biased numpties! The main news is about Sunak and HS2. Hardly a major world headline either! UK stories tend to lead in the UK except when really big ones occur elsewhere. On the eve of the Tory conference a major desertion is going to get coverage in their political section with a link provided in their main news one. Nothing to see here other than people getting excited over nothing.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 01 Oct 23 12.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
And of course this a major world headline that needs to be right smack bang up there on their main homepage - biased numpties! Iceland gone out of business in Ireland, whilst also not paying staff any redundancy or giving them any notice.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NE14T 02 Oct 23 8.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Wisbech Regarding the Biden corruption scandal the BBC doesn’t want to report. I’ve worked in financial crime for over 15 years and there is absolutely NO justification for the Biden’s to set up multiple nominee and off shore companies to transfer/funnel millions of dollars back to their families accounts. There was no underlying business rationale for this money other than Joe Biden’s influence. Corruption at the highest level. To say this is tax or regulatory planning is utter nonsense. The whole basis for this complicated structure is to hide the proceeds of crime. It is the number one red flag of money laundering typology drilled into banks and law firms. The banks who dealt with these transactions did what they were legally obliged to do and raised SARS (suspicious activity reports) which went to the US authorities. The added scandal here is that the Department of Justice and FBI sat on these referrals apparently protecting the Biden’s but things have finally broken with the Durham report and now the Oversight Committee investigation. I suggest you watch developments with an open mind but I suspect the slippery Joe Biden will in due course play the cognitive frailty card to try to avoid prosecution. Hunter Biden will go down but Joe is equally guilty. If Trump had done anything like this, the BBC would be pushing women and children out the way in their haste to report it,day in day out. They would have 30 investigative journalists pouring over it.
The beatings will stop when morale improves. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Oct 23 10.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NE14T
Wisbech Regarding the Biden corruption scandal the BBC doesn’t want to report. I’ve worked in financial crime for over 15 years and there is absolutely NO justification for the Biden’s to set up multiple nominee and off shore companies to transfer/funnel millions of dollars back to their families accounts. There was no underlying business rationale for this money other than Joe Biden’s influence. Corruption at the highest level. To say this is tax or regulatory planning is utter nonsense. The whole basis for this complicated structure is to hide the proceeds of crime. It is the number one red flag of money laundering typology drilled into banks and law firms. The banks who dealt with these transactions did what they were legally obliged to do and raised SARS (suspicious activity reports) which went to the US authorities. The added scandal here is that the Department of Justice and FBI sat on these referrals apparently protecting the Biden’s but things have finally broken with the Durham report and now the Oversight Committee investigation. I suggest you watch developments with an open mind but I suspect the slippery Joe Biden will in due course play the cognitive frailty card to try to avoid prosecution. Hunter Biden will go down but Joe is equally guilty. If Trump had done anything like this, the BBC would be pushing women and children out the way in their haste to report it,day in day out. They would have 30 investigative journalists pouring over it. As you are simply repeating what you have already said and asserted there’s little reason for me to have to again point out your errors. I had decades of experience in senior management in the food industry but that would count for nothing should a food manufacturer be making false claims about a product I don’t personally know the manufacturing process for. I might know how they could cheat, but not if they are. This is no different. You state the obvious, which has been acknowledged. It seems family members have traded on the Biden name, that foreign enterprises have sought to exploit that and that complex structures were established to receive payments. Regrettably such things are far too common these days, but that does not equal corruption, unless Joe Biden is personally involved or personally profited from it. From all that’s been revealed so far he is not and has not. If I was him I would take extreme care to make sure I was not touched by anything that could taint me. He would be a fool to do so, and as he listens to advice he is no fool. He quite possibly resents these activities but has no power to stop them. He also has a duty of care as the father of a man with significant problems. Balancing these matters cannot be easy. As I have said if evidence emerges then due process must follow. The BBC will doubtless investigate evidence. They don’t investigate innuendo. They report it. Possessing experience which means your suspicions are alerted is fine, but these need to be tempered with the fact that you are not dealing with someone like Trump who is a dodgy businessman turned politician. You are dealing with a career politician who understands very well the dangers of himself getting entangled in business.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  02 Oct 23 10.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 02 Oct 23 11.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As you are simply repeating what you have already said and asserted there’s little reason for me to have to again point out your errors. I had decades of experience in senior management in the food industry but that would count for nothing should a food manufacturer be making false claims about a product I don’t personally know the manufacturing process for. I might know how they could cheat, but not if they are. This is no different. You state the obvious, which has been acknowledged. It seems family members have traded on the Biden name, that foreign enterprises have sought to exploit that and that complex structures were established to receive payments. Regrettably such things are far too common these days, but that does not equal corruption, unless Joe Biden is personally involved or personally profited from it. From all that’s been revealed so far he is not and has not. If I was him I would take extreme care to make sure I was not touched by anything that could taint me. He would be a fool to do so, and as he listens to advice he is no fool. He quite possibly resents these activities but has no power to stop them. He also has a duty of care as the father of a man with significant problems. Balancing these matters cannot be easy. As I have said if evidence emerges then due process must follow. The BBC will doubtless investigate evidence. They don’t investigate innuendo. They report it. Possessing experience which means your suspicions are alerted is fine, but these need to be tempered with the fact that you are not dealing with someone like Trump who is a dodgy businessman turned politician. You are dealing with a career politician who understands very well the dangers of himself getting entangled in business. LOL Yeah I bet he asks Senator Bob Menendez for advice.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NE14T 04 Oct 23 9.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Teddy A very sensible link. I have never tried to excuse Trump and don’t support him. My main argument is that the BBC report anything and everything that is negative about Trump no matter if it is fact, fiction or investigation. For god sake they obsessed for years on front pages over the Trump Russian interference story which has recently been shown to be a hoax manufactured by Hilary Clinton and the FBI. They just shrug their shoulders and don’t even apologise. They constantly look the other way with Biden’s issues and show no willingness or curiosity to report. Biden’s created a disaster zone at the southern border where murder, rape, and child trafficking are rife and the BBC is just not interested. This boils down to journalists fairness and impartially which the BBC have zero when it comes to the major issues in the world. They may report a few minor stories against the Left for their stats but it’s all carefully vetted.
The beatings will stop when morale improves. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Oct 23 9.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
From a right wing tabloid making the same unsubstantiated assertions about Biden and the motivation for the Trump indictments that all the right in the USA do? The only thing interesting in that is that they acknowledge Trump could be a crook. I have always said that if evidence of corruption involving Joe Biden emerges then he should face exactly the same treatment as Trump. Right now it has not.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 04 Oct 23 10.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NE14T
Teddy A very sensible link. I have never tried to excuse Trump and don’t support him. My main argument is that the BBC report anything and everything that is negative about Trump no matter if it is fact, fiction or investigation. For god sake they obsessed for years on front pages over the Trump Russian interference story which has recently been shown to be a hoax manufactured by Hilary Clinton and the FBI. They just shrug their shoulders and don’t even apologise. They constantly look the other way with Biden’s issues and show no willingness or curiosity to report. Biden’s created a disaster zone at the southern border where murder, rape, and child trafficking are rife and the BBC is just not interested. This boils down to journalists fairness and impartially which the BBC have zero when it comes to the major issues in the world. They may report a few minor stories against the Left for their stats but it’s all carefully vetted. I think you must have an anti-BBC bias. The BBC report facts in detail. Trump has been indicted many times, that’s fact. Biden has not. His political opponents are making unsubstantiated assertions, which the BBC have reported but not gone overboard about. They won’t unless and until something of substance involving him, and not his family, emerges. You seem pretty biased about Biden too, given your opinion about him “creating” a disaster at the border. Other opinions exist. Why would the BBC report yours? The BBC is bound by its charter to remain politically neutral and from my viewpoint it does. It’s loathed in equal measure by both the right and the left for being biased against them. That speaks volumes to me. You come across as just someone else with blinkered rightish views. Your description of the Russian interference in the 2016 election being shown to be a hoax created by Hilary Clinton and the FBI made me laugh. It has not. Mueller found plenty of evidence and so did all the security services of the 5 eyes. It was only too real. That Trump wasn’t personally involved, possessed believable deniability or was protected by Barr in his ruling that sitting Presidents could not be indicted, doesn’t change that. The BBC had every reason, and a considerable duty, to report that.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.