Well, if you have any solutions. Let the world know. I certainly haven't.
It's a complex situation with no easy solutions. Israel faces security challenges, but there's always room for reevaluation and seeking better approaches to minimize civilian casualties. Historical parallels can provide context, but each situation is unique. The current actions could have long-term implications, potentially exacerbating tensions. Finding sustainable solutions is crucial for peace and stability.

And, it's not like Palestine hasn't been given the chance of peace. They have literally rejected every peace deal since 1948.

Hamas, has also said openly that, it wants to eradicate israel.

That's basically calling for genocide.

I say enough is enough. If you give them any more leeway. The violence will continue.
I agree with a two state solution. However, not governed by Hamas.

[Link]
Listen to Gazans speaking the truth about Hamas...

Yes, I can see the difference. I also see the difference in the size of the territories in both instances; one being far more civilian concentrated than the other. But your point is valid as far as numbers and timescales are involved although I would add that the allies were probably partially a peace keeping force during those twenty years, particularly in the later years.
If you have any ideas how you irradiate the enemy without causing civilian casualties (it happens in every war), then please enlighten me. Personally, I prefer the good old days when two armies would meet on a field somewhere and beat the sh1t out of each other and the winner got the territory, leaving the villagers predominantly unscathed.

You are right, defeating an ideology is difficult, hence the objections on this forum by some posters that question the trend to import that ideology into the UK. But the multicultural experiment must continue.
As to why the Palestinians should end up in Europe is bizarre; surely their Muslim Arab neighbours would only be too willing to accommodate them, or do they believe that they are a lost cause never to be inter grated into even a Muslim society?

Mate we’re not in a court of law - if you have a view or something to say, just say it - it’s a lot of telling people what they should and shouldn’t do when discussing this topic, without actually going into any detail.

You say I shouldn’t generalise but frankly that is all you’re doing; making huge general statements about ‘conflicts’ without acknowledging any of the specifics of this conflict - if you want to provide context or nuance to go against my criticisms of Israel, by all means provide it, but don’t just vaguely hint that they exist.

I agree it’s fair to criticise any country for multiple violations of international law or disregard for civilian protection, hence why I am criticising Israel.

You might want to delve a little deeper into your history books. Try, for instance, looking at the Wiki pages on the 30 Year War.

One positive policy introduced by Wellington was bring your own food. Looters and rapists from his own numbers were summarily executed. That was a revolutionary change. Prior to that, armies were fed on what they could plunder from the locality. This was policy ordered by the generals, not some indiscipline of ragged squaddies.

Given the precarious, marginal existence at that time, this usually meant that anyone within a 20 mile radius of the battle or who were unlucky enough to live en route for the marching heroes, had all their meagre provisions taken, daughters ravaged and, as a consequence, those who barely survived the endorsed pillaging, generally starved to death.

Where the west and how it acts is involved what is the difference in the ideology and beliefs. .
Gays nope they hate them, short skirts, alcohol, showing flesh, eating every DAY of the year etc etc.
the only difference is Hamas does it openly.