You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Sam Johnstone Release Clause
May 11 2024 7.57pm

Sam Johnstone Release Clause

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

 

View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 21 Jun 23 1.19pm Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Maybe I'm a bit thick but I'm never clear on which of the two parties would insist on a release clause in a contract.

For example,

If a player coming to a club like Palace but wanting to have the option of going to a bigger club if an approach were to come might they insist on one so that if a bid came in from one of the Big 6 meeting that sum, they can be off?

On the other hand, a club might be scared stiff of losing a player so that in return for giving that player a nice fat pay rise they insist on a mega release clause so as to fend off bids, but if another club was desperate enough to trigger the release - more fool them (think Chelsea, Fernandes and Benfica)

So, do we think Johnstone asked for the release clause or Palace?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 21 Jun 23 1.20pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Just having a think about this. I wonder if Pickford is off to Man U. Then this makes sense.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View The Dolphin's Profile The Dolphin Flag 21 Jun 23 1.32pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

IF he wants to join the madhouse then we are better off without him, albeit I very much hope that he stays on a better contract duration and more money.
He is a good keeper who has cemented his first team slot and long may that continue.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Painter's Profile Painter Flag Croydon 21 Jun 23 1.37pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

It has always been one of life's great mysteries to me as to why any ambitious footballer would want to join Everton.

If I were Parish, I'd write up a new contract for Johnson before he gets lured by a club that might actually win something.

Money is generally the motive.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Online Flag Oxford 21 Jun 23 1.40pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by doombear

Maybe I'm a bit thick but I'm never clear on which of the two parties would insist on a release clause in a contract.

For example,

If a player coming to a club like Palace but wanting to have the option of going to a bigger club if an approach were to come might they insist on one so that if a bid came in from one of the Big 6 meeting that sum, they can be off?

On the other hand, a club might be scared stiff of losing a player so that in return for giving that player a nice fat pay rise they insist on a mega release clause so as to fend off bids, but if another club was desperate enough to trigger the release - more fool them (think Chelsea, Fernandes and Benfica)

So, do we think Johnstone asked for the release clause or Palace?

I suspect that in a contract negotiation, both of your scenarios are in play. It therefore comes down to a negotiation and agreement over 'price' - the player will want the release clause amount to be as low as it can be while the club will want it to be as high as possible.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Ginger Pubic Wig's Profile Ginger Pubic Wig Flag Wickham de L'Ouest 21 Jun 23 4.35pm Send a Private Message to Ginger Pubic Wig Add Ginger Pubic Wig as a friend

Meh, he's okay. Can't help but feel there's better value out there if they are willing £10m. Somebody about 30-33, give our young lads a hope of making it.

 


If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Online Flag Oxford 21 Jun 23 5.44pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by Painter

Money is generally the motive.

Indeed, given that they are professional footballers.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 22 Jun 23 4.58am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Put him behind the Everton centre backs instead of ours and he’s conceding a few more I reckon !

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View becky's Profile becky Flag over the moon 22 Jun 23 6.43am Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Originally posted by doombear

Maybe I'm a bit thick but I'm never clear on which of the two parties would insist on a release clause in a contract.

For example,

If a player coming to a club like Palace but wanting to have the option of going to a bigger club if an approach were to come might they insist on one so that if a bid came in from one of the Big 6 meeting that sum, they can be off?

On the other hand, a club might be scared stiff of losing a player so that in return for giving that player a nice fat pay rise they insist on a mega release clause so as to fend off bids, but if another club was desperate enough to trigger the release - more fool them (think Chelsea, Fernandes and Benfica)

So, do we think Johnstone asked for the release clause or Palace?

Don't know who asked for it, but it would, to me, make sense for the keeper to want one.

Generally, (as I think with Johnstone) they are one of 3+ keepers on the books with no option of playing elsewhere, unlike an outfield player who can be called on to cover another position.

This means they could (and I think Palace have had keepers that did) spend their whole time with a club pushing to even get a reserve team game, let alone a 1st team team one, so it would make more sense for them to be able to 'get out' if an offer came to get actual match time else where.

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 22 Jun 23 7.55am Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by becky

Don't know who asked for it, but it would, to me, make sense for the keeper to want one.

Generally, (as I think with Johnstone) they are one of 3+ keepers on the books with no option of playing elsewhere, unlike an outfield player who can be called on to cover another position.

This means they could (and I think Palace have had keepers that did) spend their whole time with a club pushing to even get a reserve team game, let alone a 1st team team one, so it would make more sense for them to be able to 'get out' if an offer came to get actual match time else where.


Thanks Becky. That makes sense.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Qwijibo's Profile Qwijibo Flag Bournemouth 22 Jun 23 10.32am Send a Private Message to Qwijibo Add Qwijibo as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

It has always been one of life's great mysteries to me as to why any ambitious footballer would want to join Everton.

If I were Parish, I'd write up a new contract for Johnson before he gets lured by a club that might actually win something.

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View MrRobbo's Profile MrRobbo Flag Purley 22 Jun 23 11.08am Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

Originally posted by doombear

Maybe I'm a bit thick but I'm never clear on which of the two parties would insist on a release clause in a contract.

For example,

If a player coming to a club like Palace but wanting to have the option of going to a bigger club if an approach were to come might they insist on one so that if a bid came in from one of the Big 6 meeting that sum, they can be off?

On the other hand, a club might be scared stiff of losing a player so that in return for giving that player a nice fat pay rise they insist on a mega release clause so as to fend off bids, but if another club was desperate enough to trigger the release - more fool them (think Chelsea, Fernandes and Benfica)

So, do we think Johnstone asked for the release clause or Palace?

Really deepens on the size of hte release clause.

In this case it will be of Johnstons doing. Its pretty modest, and so gives him a reasonably low get out if either big club comes or an another prem club.

Harland also had a clause that became active after something like 2 seasons as Dortmund. Essentially I'll commit to you for 2 years, but I'm not going to give you the power to hold other suiters to ransom. The talk is that he has the same at City.

IF Kane had done the same he would have had his move by now.

The Villa chairman spoke about it quite a lot when City triggered Grealish's. They put it in at 100m to be fair to all sides. If Jack was performing at an incredibly high level there was always an option to buy, but Villa were protected as it would be the highest ever fee for a British player. And it made it easy to be clear on their stance....trigger the cause or don't bid.

The silly ones that Barca and co put in, I'm not sure. More for the headlines? Because in reality they can sell for whatever they want.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Sam Johnstone Release Clause