Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
MrRobbo Purley 26 Mar 24 8.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
Surprised to read that they are appealing against the 4 point deduction - I kind of understood it as a 3 point deduction for falling foul of the regulations, plus 3 points for the value of the overspend (£34.5 million) reduced by 2 points for co operation = I cant believe that they have found new evidence in such a short period of time so they must be arguing that the original process / outcome was flawed in some way- It will be interesting to see the outcome. Would be interesting to know what specifically there are appealing against, and by proxy the 1 or 3 points. Does anyone know any of the 'rules'? Could the 2 point reduction be added on?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 26 Mar 24 9.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Dubai Eagle
Maybe they are going to argue that Forest & Everton are being treated differently to Man City ? & there should be a commonality of how each case is viewed / treated & judged including timelines (in that respect I think most reasonable even minded people would probably agree) I read that the Man City hearing dates have been agreed but its not been made public & its not going to be until 2025 (presumably thats one of the reasons why its not been made public, because for sure its not a level playing field for everyone else) It is appropriate for Man City to be treated differently as they are being prosecuted for different rule breaches under a different regime.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PahrTee 26 Mar 24 9.44am | |
---|---|
Draft Picks ? Surely a spoonerism....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.