The Greens

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 28 of 34 < 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 >

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 5.09pm
Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

I will defend the greens education policies.
There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids.
Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability.
Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it.
Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago.

BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in.

You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin.

With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite?

Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster)

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we?

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired.
Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 22 Feb 15 5.14pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 22 Feb 15 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 5.17pm
Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 22 Feb 15 5.21pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 22 Feb 15 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 5.26pm
Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 5.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?

Alert a moderator to this post

Dweeb East London 22 Feb 15 7.16pm
Nick, I would be more worried that anyone thinks "flaccid" is a colour.... Taking the bungy jump since 1964. Never to see John Jackson in a shirt again Sorry to see Lee Hills go, did we ever see Alex Marrow? We did January 2013
Alert a moderator to this post

Dweeb

East London 22 Feb 15 7.16pm

Nick, I would be more worried that anyone thinks "flaccid" is a colour....

Taking the bungy jump since 1964. Never to see John Jackson in a shirt again

Sorry to see Lee Hills go, did we ever see Alex Marrow? We did January 2013

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 7.21pm
Quote Dweeb at 22 Feb 2015 7.16pm Nick, I would be more worried that anyone thinks "flaccid" is a colour.... Very good.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 7.21pm

Quote Dweeb at 22 Feb 2015 7.16pm

Nick, I would be more worried that anyone thinks "flaccid" is a colour....

Very good.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 10.10pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. What are your views on the green education policy Matthew? Tick tock
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 22 Feb 15 10.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?

Tick tock

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 23 Feb 15 9.28pm
Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. What are your views on the green education policy Matthew? Tick tock You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 23 Feb 15 9.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?

Tick tock

You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 23 Feb 15 10.05pm
Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 9.28pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. What are your views on the green education policy Matthew? Tick tock You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson. No i'd just like you to answer the question. Or say that you don't know enough to be able to answer it.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 23 Feb 15 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 9.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?

Tick tock

You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson.

No i'd just like you to answer the question. Or say that you don't know enough to be able to answer it.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 23 Feb 15 10.08pm
Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 9.28pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. What are your views on the green education policy Matthew? Tick tock You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson. No i'd just like you to answer the question. Or say that you don't know enough to be able to answer it. You don't know enough to ask the question! You invite people to comment off of the back of a Google search you post a link too. Pathetic. You don't know the difference between the trade and budget deficit. How can I have faith that you understand the difference between Green education policy and gnats arsehole? "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 23 Feb 15 10.08pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 9.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?

Tick tock

You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson.

No i'd just like you to answer the question. Or say that you don't know enough to be able to answer it.

You don't know enough to ask the question! You invite people to comment off of the back of a Google search you post a link too.

Pathetic.

You don't know the difference between the trade and budget deficit. How can I have faith that you understand the difference between Green education policy and gnats arsehole?

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 23 Feb 15 10.11pm
Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 10.08pm Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.05pm Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 9.28pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'! [Link] Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm) That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line. Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt. I will defend the greens education policies. There's much research that concludes starting formal schooling at 7 is better for kids. Greens believe education should not be left to the market and that schools should be under the remit of local authorities rather than corporate edubusiness. There's been much in the news about cronyism, backhanders and dodgy dealings in academies. Academies lack local democratic accountability. Like myself, greens are against the overtesting of children. This puts a lot of kids off of school. There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother. No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question. Sorry, can't understand that. I showed several ways in which the greens differ from the other parties. That is not dodging the question, that is answering it. Now I remember why I stopped engaging with you a while ago. BTW. I gave up playing what's the missing word. Can you enlighten us? Whilst I understand typing, writing can be an issue for you and sympathise, my advice to you would be the same as I give to my students. Read it back two or three times before handing in. You have never 'engaged' with me. You have always posted self satisfied ramblings which you think should never be questioned by anyone. The fact I have questioned you, and you clearly hate being questioned as most teachers do as being able to pontificate in front of a group of people (usually younger and far less likely to question your ramblings) is how you get your mojo, is something that obviously gets under your skin. With regard to your attempt at an insult, I have had worse insults thrown at me today by people who second language is English. Given your professed hostility to personal insults, something you have accused me of many times on here as a distraction from the point of what is being debated, does this make you a massive hypocrite? Bum gravy. If you were to engage, you'd explain why you think kids should be over tested, why there shouldn't be local democratic accountability in schools and why the academy experiment is working (even though a select committee has just declared it as a disaster) Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm) That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact. Please answer the original question. Please defend Green educational policy? By backing up what you mean (I.e., explaining what you mean by 'over testing', not simply stating it as a problem). Why is schooling better started at 7 rather than stating 'studies say this' and instead of a typical 'cunds' rant against academies, explain your opposition to them. Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link] Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link] A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link] Also, I and many of my colleagues have seen first hand the effect of over testing and the impact it has on the curriculum in schools that teach to the test rather than providing an enriching skills based curriculum. Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm) Not so tough, was it Gusset? I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight. We are still waiting with baited breath for your opinions on this Matthew. Still not forthcoming I see. I'll presume you forgot, we don't want people thinking that you are all mouth and no trousers when it comes to debating do we? You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread). Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm) Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy. Castro and Guevara (so difficult to spell you had to call him Che) achieved a great deal for many people fighting against an unjust system and defeating it. So in that respect, to be admired. Now before you jump on this and say 'oh but Gusset, you are against violent revolution so you are a hypocrite because you admire Fidel and Che' , if their violence was necessary towards their means of ridding their countries of imperialist oppression because peaceful means had failed, then so be it. Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up. You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on. So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy. Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid. Whatever Gusset. The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about. What are your views on the green education policy Matthew? Tick tock You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson. No i'd just like you to answer the question. Or say that you don't know enough to be able to answer it. You don't know enough to ask the question! You invite people to comment off of the back of a Google search you post a link too. Pathetic. You don't know the difference between the trade and budget deficit. How can I have faith that you understand the difference between Green education policy and gnats arsehole? So you don't know about the Green's education policy? Fair enough. A shame because I always thought that 'I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.' meant that some sort of response would be forthcoming. Not in the wacky world of Matthew it would seem.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 23 Feb 15 10.11pm

Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 10.08pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.05pm

Quote matt_himself at 23 Feb 2015 9.28pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 10.10pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.26pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.21pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.17pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 5.14pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 5.09pm

Quote matt_himself at 22 Feb 2015 4.53pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Feb 2015 4.00pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.22pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 10.13pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 10.01pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.49pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.45pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.39pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.30pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.12pm

Quote nickgusset at 29 Jan 2015 9.07pm

Quote matt_himself at 29 Jan 2015 9.02pm

Even Labour, yes that's right Labour, are calling the Greens policies 'total madness'!

[Link]

Ahh, the great Tristram Hunt. He's one of the reasons why many many teachers won't vote Labour.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.11pm)

That's not a retort, Gusset, it is a throwaway line.

Are you going to defend the Greens educational policy? Failure to do so would imply your agreement, at least in part, with the 'great' Tristram Hunt.

There's lots more, but you won't read it Matt so I won't bother.

No, instead you will your typical superior self when questioned and again, dodge the question.

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 9.51pm)

That's you trying to cover your tracks. Typically Trot tactics. You have provided bland nothings as fact.

Some evidence of research that formal schooling starts too early in this country... [Link]

Academies...high staff turnover, poor wages for teachers, lack of accountability... I could go on. Also there is no clear evidence that academies raise standards. [Link]

A quick look here gives many examples of research on the negative impact of over testing [Link]

Edited by nickgusset (29 Jan 2015 10.14pm)

Not so tough, was it Gusset?

I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.

You haven't answered about whether you admire violent revolutionaries such as Fidel and Che (read the thread).

Jog on Gusset.

Edited by matt_himself (22 Feb 2015 4.53pm)

Deflect deflect deflect. Your contribution to these boards is about as useful as someone with erectile dysfunction is at an orgy.

Says the man who on the UKIP thread used a bunch of cheap insults in a failed attempt to wind me up.

You are the Bez of debate, Gusset. Jog on.

So you're not going to answer the responses about green education policy.
Fair enough. Showing your true colours. Flaccid, Flaccid, Flaccid.

Whatever Gusset.

The fact is, when you look at evidence you provided, which included a Google search, you have view the provider of that information as lazy and not really knowing what he is talki about.

What are your views on the green education policy Matthew?

Tick tock

You really think you are a left wing Paxman when in fact you are a idiot brother of Paul Merson.

No i'd just like you to answer the question. Or say that you don't know enough to be able to answer it.

You don't know enough to ask the question! You invite people to comment off of the back of a Google search you post a link too.

Pathetic.

You don't know the difference between the trade and budget deficit. How can I have faith that you understand the difference between Green education policy and gnats arsehole?

So you don't know about the Green's education policy? Fair enough.
A shame because I always thought that 'I will read, digest and respond accordingly. Won't be tonight.' meant that some sort of response would be forthcoming.
Not in the wacky world of Matthew it would seem.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 28 of 34 < 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Greens

Site Map

Sponsors