As has been said before. The BBC may well have a charter of neutrality, but it is skewed by the bias of its employees.

Your bias makes you see neutral where there is bias. The BBC's idea of neutral might well be different to someone else's.

One simply cannot apply the concept of bias without applying it to ones self and to question what 'neutral' really means.

As has been said before. The BBC may well have a charter of neutrality, but it is skewed by the bias of its employees.

Your bias makes you see neutral where there is bias. The BBC's idea of neutral might well be different to someone else's.

One simply cannot apply the concept of bias without applying it to ones self and to question what 'neutral' really means.

Is this a breakthrough?

The bias of any professional journalist is irrelevant. It’s the culture of the organisation who they work for and the editorial oversight which is.

As I have said before I have a friend who wrote for the Mail but was quite far left in his personal politics. Which I don’t believe is so unusual but it did not interfere with his ability to do his job.

It clearly isn't. There has to be bias at every stage of journalism. What comes from the top is not necessarily what we see.

Murdoch owns SKY. There can't be a more 'progressive' network.
His influence is non existent.
At the BBC, it is little different in practice. The only difference is that The BBC has the pretence of a public duty to uphold neutrality, which is clearly impossible in the real world.

My God I find myself agreeing with you!

Any organisation will display bias based on its employees or even an employee. I have seen examples when the whole culture has changed when the person at the top does.

But this is all distraction politics, which is big atbtbe moment. Let's talk about Angela Rayner (when the MP who has reported her to the press continually wants to and yet never says why her reported her.) Let's focus in London on anything but ULEZ despite it having a massive financial cost to anyone in the expanded zone. Let's listen on both sides to politicians promising to 'scrap,' legislation that does not exist.

If we create enough made up things to worry the people they might not see the mess we are really in.

As has been said before. The BBC may well have a charter of neutrality, but it is skewed by the bias of its employees.

Your bias makes you see neutral where there is bias. The BBC's idea of neutral might well be different to someone else's.

One simply cannot apply the concept of bias without applying it to ones self and to question what 'neutral' really means.